Melanocytic Lesions: Difference between revisions - Compendium of Cancer Genome Aberrations

Line 1:

'''Table 1.''' '''Rates of gains and losses significantly higher than 5% for specific chromosome regions in primary melanoma of all subtypes combined''' '''(Literature Review)'''.The is a list of significantly gains and losses selected and evaluated based on a systematic literature search performed on 235 peer-reviewed manuscripts focusing on findings of copy number abnormalities in melanocytic lesions published between 1998 and 2022. Table derived from Barren et al., 2026 [<nowiki>PMID 41898865</nowiki>] with permission from Cancer Genetics. All ''p''-values in the listed CNAs were ≤0.05 and were considered indicative of significance. The abnormalities were reported by at least 3 manuscripts. Possible genes affected by the gain or loss are listed.

'''Table 1.''' '''Rates of gains and losses significantly higher than 5% for specific chromosome regions in primary melanoma of all subtypes combined''' '''(Literature Review)'''.The is a list of significantly gains and losses selected and evaluated based on a systematic literature search performed on 235 peer-reviewed manuscripts focusing on findings of copy number abnormalities in melanocytic lesions published between 1998 and 2022. Table derived from Barren et al., 2026 [<nowiki>PMID 41898865</nowiki><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Reyes Barron|first=Cynthia|last2=Geiersbach|first2=Katherine B.|last3=Alomari|first3=Ahmed K.|last4=Deak|first4=Kristen L.|last5=Golem|first5=Shivani|last6=Williams|first6=Eli S.|last7=Aypar|first7=Umut|last8=Zou|first8=Ying S.|last9=Wei|first9=Lei|date=2026-03-18|title=Clinical Utility of Copy Number Abnormality Analysis in the Evaluation of Melanocytic Lesions for Diagnosis and Prognosis: An Evidence-Based Review from the Cancer Genomics Consortium Working Group for Melanocytic Lesions|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41898865|journal=Genes|volume=17|issue=3|pages=331|doi=10.3390/genes17030331|issn=2073-4425|pmc=13026022|pmid=41898865}}</ref>] with permission from Cancer Genetics. All ''p''-values in the listed CNAs were ≤0.05 and were considered indicative of significance. The abnormalities were reported by at least 3 manuscripts. Possible genes affected by the gain or loss are listed.

{| class="wikitable"

|+

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'''Table 1.''' '''Rates of gains and losses significantly higher than 5% for specific chromosome regions in primary melanoma of all subtypes combined''' '''(Literature Review)'''.The is a list of significantly gains and losses selected and evaluated based on a systematic literature search performed on 235 peer-reviewed manuscripts focusing on findings of copy number abnormalities in melanocytic lesions published between 1998 and 2022. Table derived from Barren et al., 2026 [<nowiki>PMID 41898865</nowiki>] with permission from Cancer Genetics. All ''p''-values in the listed CNAs were ≤0.05 and were considered indicative of significance. The abnormalities were reported by at least 3 manuscripts. Possible genes affected by the gain or loss are listed.
+'''Table 1.''' '''Rates of gains and losses significantly higher than 5% for specific chromosome regions in primary melanoma of all subtypes combined''' '''(Literature Review)'''.The is a list of significantly gains and losses selected and evaluated based on a systematic literature search performed on 235 peer-reviewed manuscripts focusing on findings of copy number abnormalities in melanocytic lesions published between 1998 and 2022. Table derived from Barren et al., 2026 [<nowiki>PMID 41898865</nowiki><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Reyes Barron|first=Cynthia|last2=Geiersbach|first2=Katherine B.|last3=Alomari|first3=Ahmed K.|last4=Deak|first4=Kristen L.|last5=Golem|first5=Shivani|last6=Williams|first6=Eli S.|last7=Aypar|first7=Umut|last8=Zou|first8=Ying S.|last9=Wei|first9=Lei|date=2026-03-18|title=Clinical Utility of Copy Number Abnormality Analysis in the Evaluation of Melanocytic Lesions for Diagnosis and Prognosis: An Evidence-Based Review from the Cancer Genomics Consortium Working Group for Melanocytic Lesions|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41898865|journal=Genes|volume=17|issue=3|pages=331|doi=10.3390/genes17030331|issn=2073-4425|pmc=13026022|pmid=41898865}}</ref>] with permission from Cancer Genetics. All ''p''-values in the listed CNAs were ≤0.05 and were considered indicative of significance. The abnormalities were reported by at least 3 manuscripts. Possible genes affected by the gain or loss are listed.
 {| class="wikitable"
 |+