Line 23: |
Line 23: |
| ==Epidemiology / Prevalence== | | ==Epidemiology / Prevalence== |
| | | |
− | G34-DHG is reported to account for approximately 15% of high grade gliomas (HGSs) and typically affect adolescents and young adults with a median age at diagnosis of 15.8 years old <ref>{{Cite journal|last=Picart|first=Thiébaud|last2=Barritault|first2=Marc|last3=Poncet|first3=Delphine|last4=Berner|first4=Lise-Prune|last5=Izquierdo|first5=Cristina|last6=Tabouret|first6=Emeline|last7=Figarella-Branger|first7=Dominique|last8=Idbaïh|first8=Ahmed|last9=Bielle|first9=Franck|date=2021-01|title=Characteristics of diffuse hemispheric gliomas, H3 G34-mutant in adults|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34056608|journal=Neuro-Oncology Advances|volume=3|issue=1|pages=vdab061|doi=10.1093/noajnl/vdab061|issn=2632-2498|pmc=8156974|pmid=34056608}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Crowell|first=Cameron|last2=Mata-Mbemba|first2=Daddy|last3=Bennett|first3=Julie|last4=Matheson|first4=Kara|last5=Mackley|first5=Michael|last6=Perreault|first6=Sébastien|last7=Erker|first7=Craig|date=2022-01|title=Systematic review of diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3 G34-mutant: Outcomes and associated clinical factors|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36105387|journal=Neuro-Oncology Advances|volume=4|issue=1|pages=vdac133|doi=10.1093/noajnl/vdac133|issn=2632-2498|pmc=9466272|pmid=36105387}}</ref>. Studies have shown that there is a gender difference with male to female ratio of 1.4:1 <ref>{{Cite journal|last=Korshunov|first=Andrey|last2=Capper|first2=David|last3=Reuss|first3=David|last4=Schrimpf|first4=Daniel|last5=Ryzhova|first5=Marina|last6=Hovestadt|first6=Volker|last7=Sturm|first7=Dominik|last8=Meyer|first8=Jochen|last9=Jones|first9=Chris|date=2016-01|title=Histologically distinct neuroepithelial tumors with histone 3 G34 mutation are molecularly similar and comprise a single nosologic entity|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26482474|journal=Acta Neuropathologica|volume=131|issue=1|pages=137–146|doi=10.1007/s00401-015-1493-1|issn=1432-0533|pmid=26482474}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Mackay|first=Alan|last2=Burford|first2=Anna|last3=Carvalho|first3=Diana|last4=Izquierdo|first4=Elisa|last5=Fazal-Salom|first5=Janat|last6=Taylor|first6=Kathryn R.|last7=Bjerke|first7=Lynn|last8=Clarke|first8=Matthew|last9=Vinci|first9=Mara|date=2017-10-09|title=Integrated Molecular Meta-Analysis of 1,000 Pediatric High-Grade and Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28966033|journal=Cancer Cell|volume=32|issue=4|pages=520–537.e5|doi=10.1016/j.ccell.2017.08.017|issn=1878-3686|pmc=5637314|pmid=28966033}}</ref>. | + | G34-DHG is reported to account for approximately 15% of high grade gliomas (HGSs) and typically affect adolescents and young adults with a median age at diagnosis of 15.8 years old <ref>{{Cite journal|last=Picart|first=Thiébaud|last2=Barritault|first2=Marc|last3=Poncet|first3=Delphine|last4=Berner|first4=Lise-Prune|last5=Izquierdo|first5=Cristina|last6=Tabouret|first6=Emeline|last7=Figarella-Branger|first7=Dominique|last8=Idbaïh|first8=Ahmed|last9=Bielle|first9=Franck|date=2021-01|title=Characteristics of diffuse hemispheric gliomas, H3 G34-mutant in adults|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34056608|journal=Neuro-Oncology Advances|volume=3|issue=1|pages=vdab061|doi=10.1093/noajnl/vdab061|issn=2632-2498|pmc=8156974|pmid=34056608}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Crowell|first=Cameron|last2=Mata-Mbemba|first2=Daddy|last3=Bennett|first3=Julie|last4=Matheson|first4=Kara|last5=Mackley|first5=Michael|last6=Perreault|first6=Sébastien|last7=Erker|first7=Craig|date=2022-01|title=Systematic review of diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3 G34-mutant: Outcomes and associated clinical factors|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36105387|journal=Neuro-Oncology Advances|volume=4|issue=1|pages=vdac133|doi=10.1093/noajnl/vdac133|issn=2632-2498|pmc=9466272|pmid=36105387}}</ref>. Studies have shown that there is a gender difference with male to female ratio of 1.4:1 <ref>{{Cite journal|last=Korshunov|first=Andrey|last2=Capper|first2=David|last3=Reuss|first3=David|last4=Schrimpf|first4=Daniel|last5=Ryzhova|first5=Marina|last6=Hovestadt|first6=Volker|last7=Sturm|first7=Dominik|last8=Meyer|first8=Jochen|last9=Jones|first9=Chris|date=2016-01|title=Histologically distinct neuroepithelial tumors with histone 3 G34 mutation are molecularly similar and comprise a single nosologic entity|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26482474|journal=Acta Neuropathologica|volume=131|issue=1|pages=137–146|doi=10.1007/s00401-015-1493-1|issn=1432-0533|pmid=26482474}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Mackay|first=Alan|last2=Burford|first2=Anna|last3=Carvalho|first3=Diana|last4=Izquierdo|first4=Elisa|last5=Fazal-Salom|first5=Janat|last6=Taylor|first6=Kathryn R.|last7=Bjerke|first7=Lynn|last8=Clarke|first8=Matthew|last9=Vinci|first9=Mara|date=2017-10-09|title=Integrated Molecular Meta-Analysis of 1,000 Pediatric High-Grade and Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28966033|journal=Cancer Cell|volume=32|issue=4|pages=520–537.e5|doi=10.1016/j.ccell.2017.08.017|issn=1878-3686|pmc=5637314|pmid=28966033}}</ref>. |
| | | |
| ==Clinical Features== | | ==Clinical Features== |
Line 47: |
Line 47: |
| | | |
| ==Immunophenotype== | | ==Immunophenotype== |
− |
| |
− | <br />
| |
| | | |
| {| class="wikitable sortable" | | {| class="wikitable sortable" |
Line 65: |
Line 63: |
| ==Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions)== | | ==Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions)== |
| | | |
− | Put your text here and fill in the table
| + | Not applicable |
| | | |
| {| class="wikitable sortable" | | {| class="wikitable sortable" |
Line 75: |
Line 73: |
| !Notes | | !Notes |
| |- | | |- |
− | |EXAMPLE t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)||EXAMPLE 3'ABL1 / 5'BCR||EXAMPLE der(22)||EXAMPLE 20% (COSMIC) | + | |N/A||N/A |
− | EXAMPLE 30% (add reference)
| + | |N/A |
− | |Yes | + | |N/A |
− | |No | + | |N/A |
− | |Yes | + | |N/A |
− | |EXAMPLE | + | |N/A |
− | | + | |N/A |
− | The t(9;22) is diagnostic of CML in the appropriate morphology and clinical context (add reference). This fusion is responsive to targeted therapy such as Imatinib (Gleevec) (add reference).
| |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
| ==Individual Region Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH== | | ==Individual Region Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH== |
| | | |
− | Put your text here and fill in the table
| + | <br /> |
| | | |
| {| class="wikitable sortable" | | {| class="wikitable sortable" |
Line 97: |
Line 94: |
| !Notes | | !Notes |
| |- | | |- |
− | |EXAMPLE | + | |N/A |
− | | + | |N/A |
− | 7
| + | |N/A |
− | |EXAMPLE Loss | + | |N/A |
− | |EXAMPLE | + | |N/A |
− | | + | |N/A |
− | chr7:1- 159,335,973 [hg38]
| + | |N/A |
− | |EXAMPLE | + | |N/A |
− | | |
− | chr7
| |
− | |Yes | |
− | |Yes | |
− | |No | |
− | |EXAMPLE | |
− | | |
− | Presence of monosomy 7 (or 7q deletion) is sufficient for a diagnosis of AML with MDS-related changes when there is ≥20% blasts and no prior therapy (add reference). Monosomy 7/7q deletion is associated with a poor prognosis in AML (add reference).
| |
| |- | | |- |
− | |EXAMPLE | + | | |
− | | + | | |
− | 8
| + | | |
− | |EXAMPLE Gain | + | | |
− | |EXAMPLE | + | | |
− | | + | | |
− | chr8:1-145,138,636 [hg38]
| + | | |
− | |EXAMPLE | + | | |
− | | |
− | chr8
| |
− | |No | |
− | |No | |
− | |No | |
− | |EXAMPLE | |
− | | |
− | Common recurrent secondary finding for t(8;21) (add reference).
| |
| |} | | |} |
| ==Characteristic Chromosomal Patterns== | | ==Characteristic Chromosomal Patterns== |
Line 143: |
Line 124: |
| !Notes | | !Notes |
| |- | | |- |
− | |EXAMPLE | + | |N/A |
− | | + | |N/A |
− | Co-deletion of 1p and 18q
| + | |N/A |
− | |Yes | + | |N/A |
− | |No | + | |N/A |
− | |No | |
− | |EXAMPLE: | |
− | | |
− | See chromosomal rearrangements table as this pattern is due to an unbalanced derivative translocation associated with oligodendroglioma (add reference).
| |
| |} | | |} |
| ==Gene Mutations (SNV/INDEL)== | | ==Gene Mutations (SNV/INDEL)== |
Line 165: |
Line 142: |
| !Notes | | !Notes |
| |- | | |- |
− | |EXAMPLE: TP53; Variable LOF mutations | + | |H3F3A |
| + | |p.G34R/V |
| + | |all of this cateogory |
| + | |TP53 inactivation mutations 83%; |
| + | ATRX mutations 93% |
| | | |
− | EXAMPLE:
| + | MGMT promoter methylation 70% <ref name=":1" /> |
− | | + | |IDH |
− | EGFR; Exon 20 mutations
| + | TERT |
− | | + | |Yes |
− | EXAMPLE: BRAF; Activating mutations
| |
− | |EXAMPLE: TSG
| |
− | |EXAMPLE: 20% (COSMIC) | |
− | | |
− | EXAMPLE: 30% (add Reference)
| |
− | |EXAMPLE: IDH1 R123H | |
− | |EXAMPLE: EGFR amplification
| |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
− | |EXAMPLE: Excludes hairy cell leukemia (HCL) (add reference).
| |
− | <br />
| |
| |} | | |} |
| Note: A more extensive list of mutations can be found in cBioportal (https://www.cbioportal.org/), COSMIC (https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic), ICGC (https://dcc.icgc.org/) and/or other databases. When applicable, gene-specific pages within the CCGA site directly link to pertinent external content. | | Note: A more extensive list of mutations can be found in cBioportal (https://www.cbioportal.org/), COSMIC (https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic), ICGC (https://dcc.icgc.org/) and/or other databases. When applicable, gene-specific pages within the CCGA site directly link to pertinent external content. |
Line 188: |
Line 160: |
| ==Epigenomic Alterations== | | ==Epigenomic Alterations== |
| | | |
− | Put your text here
| + | H3.3 G34R/V/D mutations impair di- or tri- methylation of lysine 36 by blocking the access to its lysine methyltransferase (e.g. SETD2) <ref>{{Cite journal|last=Shi|first=Leilei|last2=Shi|first2=Jiejun|last3=Shi|first3=Xiaobing|last4=Li|first4=Wei|last5=Wen|first5=Hong|date=2018-05-25|title=Histone H3.3 G34 Mutations Alter Histone H3K36 and H3K27 Methylation In Cis|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29689253|journal=Journal of Molecular Biology|volume=430|issue=11|pages=1562–1565|doi=10.1016/j.jmb.2018.04.014|issn=1089-8638|pmc=6450091|pmid=29689253}}</ref>. This attenuated interaction between SETD2 and H3 K36 alters genome wide methylation level and promote tumorigenesis. |
| | | |
| ==Genes and Main Pathways Involved== | | ==Genes and Main Pathways Involved== |